Category Archives: Essays

I know nothing

This past Tuesday morning unfolded much as my Tuesday mornings have this fall: Engineer Hubby rises first, climbs into the  shower. I sit on the edge of the bed and do my ankle exercises (I managed an avulsion fracture on my left ankle, fairly impressive for a fall that involved zero alcohol, clutter or high heels), then put my tootsies into slippers and galumph my way through my morning wash-up and limp-trot downstairs in time to walk the dogs before driving carpool. All well-known activities; I could do them in my sleep. Except for the carpool part.

IMG_0782

Rosie the little brown dog did her business, then we moseyed over to a patch of grass that seemed particularly green and lovely and she paused and sniffed. Sniff sniff sniff. Slight adjustment in her hindquarters, increased energy into the sniffing. Head cocked, ears pricked POUNCE with great vigor and immediately subsequent, panicked squeaking — from the small brown mouse Rosie had neatly secured in her suddenly-massive-seeming jaws.

This, a mouse plucked from the grass, was my clue that I know nothing. In fact, I am unaware of perhaps Most of Life. My State of Wonderment is dulled. How many other dozens or perhaps hundreds of heartbeats and nervous systems and eyeballs and twitching whiskers live in the field behind my house? In the woods? Probably in my slippers every morning? OK, scratch the wonderment about the slippers lest I remain in bed all day.

Re-working a short story this week after having let it marinate for the better part of a month, I discovered a water theme running through it; not only was there a literal lake, my verbs included buoy and sail and float and drown; my protagonist struggles in the “wake” of lovemaking; her mother “sets off from the shore of agreeable topics” — none of which I deliberately chose, but all of which smacked me in my editorial face when I entered the revision stage. 

Cover of

Cover via Amazon

Julia Cameron speaks eloquently about this in The Right to Write, noting that while we blunder along capturing whatever we can, a gem is slowly forming within those bits and pieces.

I certainly didn’t set about creating this theme in the way that Rosie set about catching her wee mouse (which, dear reader, I forced her to drop). But it is only through patient listening-writing, with my not-so-great human ears, that I stumble upon the interesting stories, the living stories — the stories that will squeak or scream or holler or whimper.

This requires daily walks of my writerly self. And this week, when the page has loomed too large, too bare, too white, I have cocked my head and pricked my ears and written anyway and put the pages away and trusted that although I do not know what is in there, if I don’t set something down, I will never glimpse its whiskery face.

Is good writing enough? Depends on your bifocals …

Boston T

Boston T (Photo credit: Premshree Pillai)

I have loved James Salter‘s books for twenty-plus years. I read Light Years,  Solo Faces, and A Sport and a Pastime in my early twenties, commuting on the T. The sentences! The imagery! I was rapt. I babbled on about him to anyone who would listen. Once, if I’m not mistaken, I missed the social cues of a total stranger who commented on the jacket design but was, in retrospect, probably trying to connect with me on a more, ah, visceral, level.

And this past spring, his novel All That Is was released. It came out before my birthday; I put it on my wish list, and it was the first gift I sat down to savor.

His sentences: still gorgeous. Imagery, check. Felt like I was “in the book?” Not so much. I’m well past the mid-point of my life; my most strident days are, at least for the moment, in the past (though I’ve also learned to never say never ‘cuz then next thing you know your veggie husband’s going all carnivore because carbs are bad and the auto-pilot grocery shopping that used to take twenty minutes morphs into a meander through the meat department, truly a foreign land for a former vegetarian). But I could not relate to Salter’s characters: primarily men, who bed women, who find their physical satisfactions in women, who strive for things that strike me as — dare I say it? — superficial. No amount of gorgeous writing can sustain my interest in a story that I don’t connect with. At least not this year.

A writer I respect noted that because Salter is from a different era, we thus have to grant his work some leeway vis-a-vis our standards of equality, etc.  Despite his sexist-by-today’s-standards representation of the world, my colleague continued, he’s one of the great writers.

Stack of Books

Stack of Books (Photo credit: KristinNador)

This set me to puzzling. I agree that those from different temporal and geographic points in human civilizations cannot be held to the social mores and standards of our own. Nonetheless, the idea that great writing can be such solely because of its  craftsmanship unsettled me. Can a book that leaves me completely cold be “great” for me? Do I have to be wrong about its qualities? Or are those of us who write, and who read the recommended Works of Great Literature just fooling ourselves into imagining there’s an objective standard by which Literature can be judged? That if one doesn’t like author X, it’s because we don’t get it, rather than that perhaps author X isn’t, in all circumstances and in all their works, Great. And what the heck: who’s great all the time? Not me. Glass houses and all that.

My puzzling led me to decide that I don’t quibble with the quality of Salter’s writing. But I’m done spending time with authors who build worlds where women, non-Caucasians,  young men,  hippies, potheads, whoever — don’t resonate with me by page one hundred. And I will give any author a hundred pages: I liken this to the point made by David James Poissant in his essay, “I Want to Be Friends with Republicans” (Nov. 3 2013 New York Times.) It takes time to get to know someone, and we’re all more than One Issue. I read to immerse myself in other worlds, and I have been surprised more than once by initially-offensive characters whose authors lead me to places of unexpected wellsprings of empathy within myself.

Small Beauties

Small Beauties (Photo credit: ecstaticist)

We find meaning where we see it, and just because someone else resonates with an essay, poem, novel, or short story doesn’t mean we will, or that we should. We should seek meaning for ourselves, connections between ourselves and others, sustenance for ourselves — sustenance to carry us through  whatever tedium our daily labors entail, sustenance for us to give thanks for the thousand small beauties inherent in our lives.

I don’t care, anymore, if, for you, it’s Great Literature or formulaic romance. I do care that we find our connections wheresoever they are, and that we even aspire to such seeking.

And this leads me to an unpleasant discovery: in the darker corners of my soul, I want my interpretation of what stories should do to be Right. To be The Way to Interpret Literature. I don’t want to allow that your Favorite Great Writer might be mediocre to me. Oh! My hypocrisy hast bitten me squarely on my rump yet again!

[grumble]

Anna Quindlen

Anna Quindlen (Photo credit: Angela Radulescu)

With this conundrum in the forefront of my mind, I browsed my bookshelf for guidance. I found it in Anna Quindlen‘s succinct, slender book, How Reading Changed My Life:

Reading has as many functions as the human body, and … not all of them are cerebral. … And if readers use words and stories as much, or more, to lessen human isolation as to expand human knowledge, is that somehow unworthy, invalid, and unimportant?

Nope. Whatever eases your journey is worthy, valid and important. I wish for you today at least a haiku’s-worth of beauty and connection. Or a limerick’s-worth, if that serves you better.

“I am betting on Art.”

English: Bars in Sanok

(Photo credit: Wikipedia)

I drank down all of Kate Atkinson‘s Life After Life Monday night, so absorbed I didn’t notice the clock had ticked well past my day’s usual closing time. I paid the next day with a condition Engineer Hubby has dubbed “book hangover.” An achy, tetchy state of being that’s unpleasant for innocent bystanders but that provides the sufferer with an itch for some hair of the dog, as it were — a reminder of the joyful abandon I experience when I sit for an entire evening at a novel’s long, elegant bar, sipping whiskey tumblers full of fine prose and excellent plotting.

I treated my hangover with shorter essay-reading, and refer you here to what cured my headache (or, at least, helped me forget about it): Paige Williams’ article in the August 12 & 19 (2013) issue of The New Yorker, about Bill Arnett, a “seventy-four year old white man” who’s a curator-collector of “the world’s most comprehensive collection of art made by untrained black Southerners.” It costs $ to read the whole thing from the New Yorker website, here, but it’s worth perusing if you have the interest and some $ to spare.

Perhaps unsurprisingly, Arnett is a controversial figure and like many controversial figures, he’s writing a memoir. The last lines of the article cite his words:

It is my nervous and trembling, but history-based and always optimistic, prediction that great culture will outlast corrupt bureaucrats and their heavy-handed abuses of power, and the greed-driven, callous and destructive tactics of bloodless profiteers. So, metaphorically speaking, I am betting on Art.

Coincidence that all my (grasping?) analogies have to do with drinking and gambling? I don’t think so: you have to be slightly inebriated with a love of the world to try to sit down and share that passion with others via words. The whole undertaking is a crapshoot.

Rapid Riffle Shuffle in a Poker Game

(Photo credit: Todd Klassy)

Down your tequila, draw your cards, go all in: set your butt down at the bar, write like it’s five minutes ’til closing time and you hold all the aces.